Start with roles, tasks and boundaries
We begin with the participants, their recurring work and the AI tools your organisation permits. A marketing team, operations group and client-service team should not receive the same generic prompt demonstration. We select tasks where practice can produce a reusable method, such as structuring a draft, comparing source material or preparing a first summary.
Before the workshop, we agree what information must not enter the tool, which examples can be used and who owns the output. Exercises use approved, non-sensitive material. We do not ask participants to upload customer records, confidential contracts, passwords or other restricted data. Your internal policies and tool settings remain authoritative.
- Participant roles and current level
- One or more repeatable workplace tasks
- Approved tools, accounts and access
- Data restrictions and accountable output owner
Practise a complete workflow, not a clever prompt
Participants learn to define the task, supply useful context, set constraints and request a suitable format. They then inspect the first answer, identify what is missing and refine their instructions. This makes prompting part of a work process rather than a phrase to memorise.
The facilitator demonstrates uncertainty, unsupported claims and inconsistent results instead of hiding them. Teams compare outputs and discuss when another source, calculation or colleague is required. Role-specific exercises can cover writing, research preparation, summarisation or repetitive administration where the chosen tool and data rules make the task appropriate.
- Clear task, audience and expected format
- Relevant context without restricted information
- Iteration based on identified gaps
- Human checks before the output is used
Turn the session into a safe next step
Each reusable workflow records its purpose, permitted inputs, review steps and situations where it should not be used. Participants leave with practical material rather than an ungoverned library of prompts. Managers agree where experimentation can continue and where existing approval remains necessary.
A training recommendation can identify further practice by role, shared standards or a follow-up workshop. It does not promise adoption, saved hours or financial results. Those depend on the task, tool, process and team. The useful outcome is a group that can recognise an appropriate use case, review the answer and remain accountable for the work.
- Reusable workflow with defined limits
- Output-review checklist
- Manager-owned next experiment
- Training recommendation based on observed needs
Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions
Do participants need technical experience?
No. We adapt the starting point to the group and the approved tool. Participants should understand their own work and be ready to test an agreed non-sensitive task.
Can the workshop use our real business material?
Only material your organisation approves for the selected tool. We plan exercises with non-sensitive or sanitised examples and discuss the data boundary before participants begin.
Is this a certification course?
No. It is practical workplace training focused on selected roles and tasks. The proposal defines session format, preparation, materials and follow-up; it does not confer a professional certification.